Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Dalam Tata Kelola Organisasi Untuk Mitigasi Risiko: Model Hourglass

Authors

  • Daryanto Hesti Wibowo Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen Stiami

Keywords:

AI, Governance, Organizations, Risks

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly spreading across organizations. However, this development must be followed by an awareness of the risks from the use of AI. AI risk management ensures the development of socially responsible AI in society 5.0. The purpose of this literature study is to examine a comprehensive governance model with the AI Hourglass Model governance framework. This AI governance allows organizations to develop their business based on risk. This framework is designed to help organizations implementing AI systems incorporate risk management principles into practice and align AI systems and processes with existing standards. Risk management in this study refers to the COSO ERM Framework. The Hourglass Model framework includes governance requirements at the environmental, organizational, and AI system levels. Risk mitigation is attempted at each layer of AI governance in this model to ensure sustainable organizational governance. This model sheds light on the systemic nature of AI governance and opens new research avenues into its practical implementation, the mechanisms connecting different layers of AI governance, and the management dynamics of governance actors. This study provides an initial overview for organizational decision makers to consider the elements of governance needed to ensure social acceptance, mitigate risks, and optimally develop the potential of AI.

References

Butcher, J., & Beridze, I. (2019). What is the State of Artificial Intelligence Governance Globally? RUSI Journal, 164(5–6), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1694260

Dignum, V. (2022). Responsible Artificial Intelligence --- From Principles to Practice. ACM SIGIR Forum, 56(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582524.3582529

Eitel-Porter, R. (2021). Beyond the promise: implementing ethical AI. AI and Ethics, 1(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00011-6

Fanto, J. (2023). Compliance risk management. Broker-Dealer Compliance, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800889576.00008

Mäntymäki, M., Minkkinen, M., Birkstedt, T., & Viljanen, M. (2022). Putting AI Ethics into Practice: The Hourglass Model of Organizational AI Governance. (2022). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00335

Ramírez, R., & Selsky, J. W. (2016). Strategic Planning in Turbulent Environments: A Social Ecology Approach to Scenarios. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.09.002

Seppälä, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2021). From Ethical AI Principles to Governed AI. Forty-Second International Conference on Information Systems, (January), 1–17.

Whittlestone, J., Alexandrova, A., Nyrup, R., & Cave, S. (2019). The role and limits of principles in AI ethics: Towards a focus on tensions. AIES 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314289

Downloads

Published

2024-04-04

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3: Oktober 2023

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Please find the rights and licenses in Prosiding Seminar STIAMI By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.

  1. License

The commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

2. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

Prosiding Seminar STIAMI spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Prosiding Seminar STIAMI permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Prosiding Seminar STIAMI on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Prosiding Seminar STIAMI will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Prosiding Seminar STIAMI will only communicate with the corresponding author.

5. Miscellaneous

Prosiding Seminar STIAMI will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Prosiding Seminar STIAMI editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.

 

Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement"prior to the article publication.