About the Journal
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Focus and Scope
The Journal invites original articles and not simultaneously submitted to another journal or conference, which includes, but is not limited to: public administration,public sector management, and public policy.
Peer Review Process
The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for Jurnal Luaran (JUARA) Mahasiswa Komunikasi focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similiarity score by using Turniitin.
The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.
The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterwards, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.
All manuscripts are reviewed by double-blind reviewers consisting of an editor and members of the Editorial Board or qualified outside/external reviewers. This is done within the shortest given time. The journal, above all, strives to return reviewers’ comments to authors within 3 weeks. The Editorial Board re-review manuscripts that are accepted until they are revised.
Publication Frequency
This journal publish two times on …… and ……..
Open Access Policy
Open Access Statement
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public to supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Benefits of open access for the author, include:
1. Free access for all users worldwide
2. Increased visibility and readership
3. Rapid publication
4. No spatial constraints
Sponsors
Sources of Support
We would like to thank for cooperation partners, support, and participate in preparing this online journal, and we are deeply grateful to the peer reviewer for taking the time to provide valuable review, comments and suggestions.
